According to industry mag B&T, creative gurus are blaming cost pressures. They claim agencies are being screwed and clients won’t pay the price required for great creative which now manifests itself in shithouse ads.
This argument begs a couple of questions. Like what on earth is the ad industry doing submitting record numbers of entries of below standard work in the first place? Next, for how long can an ad agency get away with justifying its very existence producing mediocre creative in order to meet a client’s bargain basement criteria? Does this mean advertising creative is now just a commodity with bad, poor, average, good, better and best creative executions inexorably linked to the size of the fee?
There is a modicum of truth in the discount price argument. And here’s why.
Carefully sift through this year’s Caxton entries and I bet you’ll find most were from ‘pseudo agencies’. They’re the growing number of client in-house set-ups that have the temerity to call themselves an ‘advertising agency’. These guys are beginning to look like a regular agency simply because the regular agencies are sinking ever lower and producing increasingly inferior work.
But here’s the real rub. These pseudo agencies exist in the first place because of the ad industry’s own stupidity. Why, you ask? Well for starters we failed to properly invest in people to ensure our very creative future, and second, we just might have been a tad too greedy in years gone by. Little wonder clients have moved to do their own thing. Fortunately for very good ad people, the clients are doing it with clearly bad creative resources, the results of which are now becoming glaringly apparent at just about every type of industry award. To make matters worse still, after this year’s Caxton debacle, the real ad agencies have gone public and virtually admitted to compromising creative and reducing work standards based purely on the size of the available fee.
The really, really damming thing about all this is that truly great creative (that may well cost a few bucks more and easily pays for itself a hundred times over) is under genuine threat of becoming an endangered species.
The irony about these developments is that ultimately it’s the clients themselves who face the greatest dilemma. You see it’s not about how much further clients can screw agencies but more a case of who will there be left to screw? The very good creative people, the ones who can get a real advertising job in a real advertising agency and create work that generates millions in sales for equally astute clients, are already in very short supply. As for everyone else, maybe they should look to China where everything can be produced and sold for bugger-all.